How Writers Are Actually Using AI Right Now

local AI writing tool, private AI writing tool

The popular image of "AI writing" is someone typing a one-line prompt and publishing whatever comes out. The research paints a very different, much more hands-on picture.

Most Writers Use It for Everything Except the Actual Prose

According to the 2025 "A.I. and The Writing Profession" survey of 291 fiction authors, the most popular AI tasks weren't drafting chapters. They were brainstorming, research, and finding the right word or phrase. Only 11% of fiction authors who use AI use it to generate text they actually publish (Publishers Weekly).

That distinction matters more than it might seem. It means the most common use of AI among fiction writers looks less like delegation and more like consultation: a faster way to test an idea, untangle a sentence, or get unstuck mid-scene, with the actual writing still happening at the keyboard.

Writers Treat AI Use as a Series of Deliberate Choices

A 2025 study from the University of Washington, presented at the ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, offers the most detailed look yet at how working creative writers actually integrate AI. Researchers interviewed and observed 18 creative writers who already use AI regularly, and found that these writers describe their relationship with AI in strikingly varied terms, sometimes as an assistant, sometimes as an editor, sometimes as a muse, sometimes simply as a tool, depending on the moment and the task (ACM Digital Library / arXiv).

The study found that writers make ongoing, deliberate decisions about exactly when and how to bring AI into their process, shaped by their personal values around authenticity, craftsmanship, ownership, and creativity (ACM Digital Library / arXiv). In practice, that means two writers working in the same genre, with access to the same tools, can end up with completely different AI workflows, because they're optimizing for different things.

A Useful Framework: Four Different Working Styles

Publishing industry analyst Jane Friedman, who has advised authors for nearly three decades and has been cited by The New York Times and Poets & Writers, has described four broad working styles among authors who use AI regularly, informally labeled Gardeners, Bakers, Weavers, and Architects, each reflecting a different philosophy about how much creative control to hand over and at what stage of the process (Jane Friedman). The exact split varies by writer, but the underlying point holds up across the research: there isn't one way authors use AI. There are many, and the differences are intentional, not accidental.

What This Looks Like in Practice

Some real examples illustrate just how varied the actual output can be. Author Elizabeth Ann West and writer Stacey Anderson together produced two 17,000-word women's fiction novellas in roughly 21 hours using AI models as part of their process, a pace that would be extremely difficult to sustain through unassisted drafting alone (Jane Friedman). That's on the far end of fast, heavily AI-integrated production. At the other end, plenty of working novelists use AI only to brainstorm a single plot problem and never touch it again for the rest of the manuscript.

The Common Thread

Across the survey data and the academic research, one pattern holds steady: writers who use AI well tend to use it surgically, not as a wholesale replacement for the writing process. They bring it in for a specific job, whether that's testing several versions of a single line of dialogue or untangling a plot knot, and then they go back to writing the rest themselves.

That's a meaningfully different picture than "AI writes books now." It's closer to: a small but growing number of working writers have found a handful of specific moments in their process where a thinking partner helps, and they've gotten precise about exactly which moments those are.

Sources

My Private AI

Take control of your security content.

© Copyright 2026 My Private AI - All rights reserved.